The requirement for vaccination in the health sector in Germany is constitutional. This was officially announced by the German constitutiona...
The requirement for vaccination
in the health sector in Germany is constitutional. This was officially
announced by the German constitutional court on Thursday, May 19.
As a result, healthcare workers may be forced to
get the vaccine in the near future in order to keep their jobs.
The obligation to vaccinate
employees in care and medical facilities is compatible with the Basic Law,
according to the decision. The Federal Constitutional Court declared on
Thursday in Karlsruhe that it interferes with physical integrity, but this is
constitutionally justified ...! Consequently, the Constitutional complaint
by more than 50 people was rejected ...
It is a decision that could
give German politicians another chance to bring the issue of compulsory
vaccination back, something that is well known in the minds of many German
politicians, who often do not even hide it. Of course, such a decision
paves the way for all the governments of the world to lay off workers who will
not be permanently vaccinated ...! Obviously the Greek Prime Minister will
be one of the first ...! Unfortunately, nothing is over, as most people
think. They just leave us relaxed for the summer .... and then ...
The following is part of the
decision
In a decision published today,
the First Senate of the Federal Constitutional Court rejected a constitutional
complaint against Article 20a, Article 22a and Article 73 (1a) no. 7e to
7h of the law for the prevention and control of infectious diseases in humans
(Law on protection against infections - IfSG). This regulates the
obligation of certain healthcare institutions and companies to provide evidence
of COVID-19 vaccination, recovery from COVID-19 disease or medical
contraindications for vaccination (the so-called "evidence-based ).
The provisions in question do
not infringe the rights of the complainants, in particular under Article 2.2
(1) of the Basic Law and Article 12.1 of the Basic Law. As long as the
regulations interfere with the fundamental rights mentioned, these
interventions are constitutionally justified. In the context of the
assessment it is entitled to, the legislator has found the right balance
between protecting vulnerable individuals from coronavirus infection
SARS-CoV-2, which is sought with the obligation to provide evidence, and
violations of fundamental rights. Despite the high intensity of the
intervention, the constitutionally protected interests of the complainants
working in the field of health and care must finally take second place.
The whole decision here
Comment on our article
The views expressed in this blog post do not necessarily reflect those of the article. Our blog does not endorse the views of the authors, nor does it identify with the topics it reposts from other news sites and is not responsible for their validity, credibility or content.
Follow ellinikiafipnisis.blogspot.com
στο Facebook...
at GAB ...
on Twitter
share it with your friends!
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια
Μπορείτε να γράψετε και να σχολιάσετε τα πάντα, αλλά αν το κείμενο σας περιέχει υβριστικούς χαρακτηρισμούς σας ενημερώνουμε ότι δεν θα δημοσιεύεται. Σε περίπτωση καθυστέρησης δημοσίευσης των σχολίων ζητούμε συγγνώμη και παρακαλούμε να μην βγάζετε αυθαίρετα συμπεράσματα. Με σεβασμό και εκτίμηση η διαχείριση του ιστολογίου